applause

Awards event recognises excellence in Isle of Wight health services commissioning and Primary Care

This in from IW NHS Trust. Ed


The annual Isle of Wight Clinical Commissioning Group awards recognise excellence in health service commissioning and primary care across the Island.

Commissioners, GPs, practice nurses and other practice staff come together to celebrate achievements and service beyond the call of duty to the Island. The awards, held at Cowes Yacht Haven on Friday 24th March, were sponsored by KPMG who are currently working with the CCG and other partners on the new care model for the Island.

Hosted by Dr Rivers
The awards evening commenced with a drum and pipe display by Ryde Sea Cadets who played in host for the evening, CCG Chair Dr John Rivers. Dr Rivers, who retires at the end of March after 35 years in the NHS and six years as the Clinical Commissioning Group’s first chair reflected on the development of primary care and the health service saying that

“General practice for me is the jewel in the crown in the NHS. The challenge facing primary care with the intensity of work and rapidly evolving workforce is immense….. and tonight we celebrate the dedication and determination of everyone who makes family medicine work and we celebrate the work of the CCG.”

Practice Employee of the Year – Jo Mclean, Shanklin Medical Centre
CCG Employee of the Year – Cath Love, Senior Quality Manager, CCG
Team of the Year – Secondary Care Hospital Commissioning Team, CCG
CCG Improvement/Development – Clinical Placements Sandown, Sandown Health Centre Nurses & Sandown District Nurses with Catherine Ward & Moira Sugden
Nurse Working in Primary Care – Sarah Hill, Sandown Health Centre
Practice Manager of the Year – Angela Waters, South Wight Medical Centre
Special Recognition – Dr Jo Hesse, Esplanade Surgery, Ryde
Special Recognition – Dr Judith Moore, Carisbrooke Health Centre
Special Recognition – Sarah Rochford, Primary Care Asst Manager and organiser of the awards event
Special Recognition – Dr John Rivers, outgoing chair of the CCG
GP of Year – Dr Oommen John, Ventnor Medical Centre
Practice of the Year – Esplanade Surgery, Ryde

All the award recipients received porcelain bowls designed and crafted by Neil Tregear, from Tregear Pottery, Niton.

Helen Shields, Chief Officer at Isle of Wight CCG said:

“All the winners deserve recognition for the excellent work that they do for the Island. They are the few, who are supported by the many, without whom our fantastic health service would not be able to function. I particularly want to highlight the important role John Rivers has undertaken for the last six years.

“As CCG Chair he has led the CCG through some challenging waters and helped to steer a path for the Island’s health and care services which will, we hope, create a sustainable service for the future.

“We will be sorry to say goodbye to him but we are fortunate in having an excellent new chair, Dr Michelle Legg, GP at Tower House Surgery in Ryde. I am sure Michelle will keep the CCG on course during the difficult times the health service is currently facing.”

Image: garryknight under CC BY 2.0

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
6 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JamesP
14, January 2013 11:18 am

If 60% of the samples were unusable, at least that many need to be re-taken, surely, if only to fulfil the original brief? And if none of the samples (good or bad) was tested for asbestos, then the results are incomplete and inconclusive. As with children’s homework, it all needs to be done again, and properly this time!

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence…

James Luke
16, January 2013 11:39 am

The whole system seems to rely on trust with no independent oversight. A major multi-national that will make many millions of pounds in profit should this planning application go ahead. They are paying Consultants to prove that the development should go ahead. I believe this type of analysis should be conducted independently. To make matters worse, it is unclear what the punishment is if the planning application… Read more »

JILL RUSSELL
18, January 2013 1:10 pm

Historical research shows that the perimeter of the site where most of these boreholes will be taken follows the line of enclosure of the former oyster beds and before them the salterns. So whatever soil samples they get from these areas, they won’t provide any worthwhile information about the levels of contamination from the waste which was deposited from at least 1912 onwards (County Press records).

James Luke
6, April 2013 1:58 pm

ASBESTOS CONTAMINATION HAS NOW BEEN CONFIRMED AT THE ASPHALT PLANT SITE. After months or argument and objections concerning the risk of asbestos contamination at the site, the IWC Planning Department has just published the latest soil report. It states, “Asbestos containing materials were encountered within the near surface waste and capping material.” This is after months of denial by the Applicant and accusations of scaremongering by Councillors.… Read more »

wightywight
Reply to  James Luke
6, April 2013 5:14 pm

James Luke: What are the prospects now of the applicant offering to *clean up* the site by removing the ‘top soil’ – not sure how deep the “near surface waste and capping material”..is? Any ideas on that? Is it feasible to clean up a site such as this by digging the contamination out and taking away (to contaminate another site somewhere!!)the soil..? What might be likely costs… Read more »

James Luke
Reply to  wightywight
6, April 2013 10:22 pm

The soil contaminated with Asbestos was going to be excavated and used in the bunds. There are recommendations in the consultants report that any contaminated soil must be capped, all workers should be wearing protective gear, etc. I suspect that if you pay enough it’s possible to clean up most types of contamination. However, this is just one reason to object to this plant. In addition, there… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  James Luke
6, April 2013 10:35 pm

I’m wondering whether cleaning up asbestos outdoors may have implications for more than the protected workers doing the job – fibres floating off in the air, perhaps. Whereas indoors it’s a contained environment.

James Luke
Reply to  tryme
6, April 2013 10:52 pm

Excavating soil contaminated with asbestos immediately adjacent to a public footpath used by runners, cyclists and walkers must be a risk to the public.

tryme
Reply to  James Luke
6, April 2013 5:47 pm

Congratulations James Luke, on getting this far through sheer determination.

James Luke
Reply to  tryme
6, April 2013 5:57 pm

I can’t take any credit for this – the credit goes to Harvey and others who have tirelessly pursued this issue.

Personally, I feel that the Council Officers should have been doing this work!!

My thanks go out to my friends and colleagues in WRAP who have done the real work!

Bystander
Reply to  James Luke
6, April 2013 6:31 pm

@James Luke The treacherous Councillors should hopefully just have time for their swan-song of now accusing the Planning Department of scaremongering before they are unceremoniously dumped in the forthcoming elections.

retiredhack
Reply to  James Luke
6, April 2013 6:33 pm

@James Luke: James (or anyone), can you point me in the direction of (documented) claims by councillors of scaremongering? (I don’t doubt you for a moment that it’s occurred, it’s just that now would be a good time to remind them of what they said.)

James Luke
Reply to  retiredhack
6, April 2013 8:00 pm

Here’s an IWRadio article on the subject =>
http://www.iwradio.co.uk/articles/2012-10-01-anti-asphalt-plant-campaigners-scaremongering

Here’s the OnTheWight article on the subject =>
http://onthewight.com/2012/10/23/david-pughs-anti-asphalt-plant-scaremongering-claim-challenged/

Councillor Pugh highlights a photo image posted on the WRAP web site as an example of scaremongering but then generalises his comment referring to “aspects like that”.

Black Dog
6, April 2013 4:05 pm

James Luke, I take my hat off to you and others for pursuing this matter. The Applicant, The HSE, The Planning Department, Councillors Pugh and Brown – Not fit for purpose This entire application stinks of corruption and must be halted. In fact if the Applicant took the honorable way out and abandoned the PFI contract it would do the Island a big favour. Let us face… Read more »

tryme
6, April 2013 11:17 pm

Re-reading the details at the top of the topic again, about borehole readings, it is breathtaking the applicant thought they could get away with what they supplied. Dozey old Isle of Wight, they’ll never notice… They weren’t reckoning on James Luke et al!

James Luke
Reply to  tryme
6, April 2013 11:30 pm

Harvey and others are the ones to congratulate! Surprisingly, I believe that WRAP’s assessment was that the latest boreholes were still not adequate for a proper assessment. We did not believe that either the number of the position of the boreholes was sufficient to properly evaluate the site …. yet they still turned up contamination. Similar objections are being raised on the air quality assessment. WRAP are… Read more »

tryme
Reply to  James Luke
7, April 2013 12:13 am

Yes, it’s extraordinary that WRAP have had to become experts on this because IWC aren’t doing the job themselves. I can only speculate to myself why this would be so…

Black Dog
Reply to  tryme
7, April 2013 9:47 am

If regime change is is delivered on May 2nd this entire mess will be dealt with swiftly.

By voting in candidates who actually care and represent their wards before party politics, we can take back control from these despots, over inflated directors and officers.

Make your votes count by voting anything other than Conservative

downwind resident
Reply to  James Luke
7, April 2013 1:02 pm

Would that be the same Council Officer who instructed the Regulatory Committee, to ignore the fact that the proposed asphalt plant will be emitting hazardous particulate contamination, at the hearing for the Environmental Permitby Eurovia recently?
Has the statutory ambient air quality survey of the Medina Valley been undertaken yet and if so by whom?
Certainly not the Council officers!

Black Dog
Reply to  downwind resident
7, April 2013 1:31 pm

There are very many unanswered questions regarding this and other contracts this regime has signed the Island up for. If the Independents can prove (with the help of ordinary council workers) wrong-doings, I am absolutely certain that they will pursue any and all legal remedies available to them – No one should be excluded Councillors, Directors (past and present) managers and the companies themselves. So if it… Read more »

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined