Background to Island’s “Inadequate” Serious Case Review Of Infant Death

Background to Island's Inadequate Serious Case Review Of Infant DeathSadly the death of a 30 day old baby occurred on the Island back in August 2007.

When something like this happens, the Isle of Wight Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB) carries out a Serious Case Review to, among other things, assess how the ‘agencies’ worked together and to identify if lessons can be learned.

Reports were requested from nine agencies known to have had professional involvement with the case.

The Island’s Serious Case review was submitted in June 2008.

At the start of the year, 30 January 2009, Ofsted who oversee this process, judged the Serious Case Review as “Inadequate.”

They citied concerns with the independence of the overview report author and the quality of some of the reports submitted by agencies (involved with the original case) were judged as inadequate.

A new report
Following this the Island’s LSCB commissioned the services of an independent overview author and of an independent chair and went over the process again.

Following this a list of 51 recommendations was produced (PDF).

An interview with Deborah Gardiner on the subject follows shortly.

Image: Orin Optiglot

Advertisement
Subscribe
Email updates?
7 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anna
15, May 2009 6:01 pm

Reading the County Press today and reading this makes me think that the Council just can’t help trying to keep everything secret and hoping people won’t notice. This is important and we wouldn’t even know about it if the Council had had their way.

Deborah Gardiner
Reply to  Anna
15, May 2009 7:05 pm

The Council continues to fight tooth and nail to keep the Ofsted letter secret. It CAN publish the letter, Ofsted guidance is clear, but it is choosing not to do so. Cllr Wells was being very economical with the truth when he stated in a press release that the letter only criticised the writing of the report not the handling of the case. I’m carrying on trying… Read more »

SRM
15, May 2009 9:40 pm

Hi Deborah, Well done for your work. I’m sure you are aware, but from what you say the council obviously cannot use an ‘absolute exemption’ to decline a FoI request, They would have to argue that the public interest in witholding is greater than the public interest in release. If they try that then an appeal to the ICO may well be fruitful. The ICO is all… Read more »

minty
Reply to  SRM
15, May 2009 10:05 pm

Whilst I am not in the least suprised, Mrs Minty can hardly contain herself! Her point is as follows…..Cllr “Debbie” Gardiner of The Mall, Brading, has suddenly resurfaced from a 3-year sabitical of “doing nothing” for the good folk of Lake. Her attendance at the local Parish Council meeings is as rare as hen’s teeth….yet, she still has the diabolical front to put herself forward as a… Read more »

Dorothy Coleman
Reply to  minty
16, May 2009 10:53 am

If Mrs Minty lived in Lake she would know what Deborah Gardiner does for Lake, we all know the work she does at County Hall and at Surgeries at the Royal Oak, as well as brining Council officials down to see us.

Deborah Gardiner
Reply to  SRM
16, May 2009 11:26 am

Thanks for that SRM – I am not at all sure what the FOI status is for this kind of letter – I’ve only done FOI requests that have been really straightforward before and this appears more complicated. I’ll look into it further – thanks.

Deborah Gardiner
16, May 2009 11:22 am

I certainly do local surgeries, hold residents meetings when people want them/need them and take up all kinds of planning issues, nuisance neighbour problems, traffic problems etc. If Mrs Minty wants to give me a ring I’ll happily talk to her – 405825. Anyway – as well as the day to day issues, Councillors are also responsible for broader issues such as schools reorganisation and the safeguarding… Read more »